Sefer APIs
Decisions

D-0002 · Seder Olam is the primary count

When the traditional count and the historians' count disagree, which is primary?

Seder Olam is primary. The historians' count is stored beside it as a second value — never discarded — and every check flags where the two disagree.

StatusRuled by the owner
Set20 Tishrei 5787 · 2026-10-01 12:53
Recorded inheld 8a88db89
Rests onD-0000, D-0001
Affectsthe date of every book before the Second Temple, the direction of links between books the two counts date differently
Would change ifA Daas Torah ruling otherwise.

The options on the table

  • Seder Olam primary; the historians' count stored beside it; disagreements flagged (chosen)
  • Seder Olam only
  • The historians' count only, converted to Hebrew years
  • No primary — every check runs under both counts

Why the count is a decision at all

For most of history the two counts agree once converted. For the Persian period they do not, by about 165 years:

  • The churban of the First Temple — 3338 by Seder Olam (= 423/422 BCE by arithmetic); 587/586 BCE by the Babylonian king lists (≈ 3175).
  • Yehoyachin's release (Melachim II 25:27) — 3364 by Seder Olam; 561 BCE by the king lists (≈ 3200).
  • The Persian kingdom during the Temple — 34 years: "מלכות פרס בפני הבית שלשים וארבע שנה" (Avodah Zarah 9a; Seder Olam Rabbah 30); about 207 years by the historians.

The question was raised first in the Jewish world by Azariah de Rossi, Me'or Einayim (1573), and has been treated by R' Shimon Schwab ("Comparative Jewish Chronology") and Mitchell First (Jewish History in Conflict, 1997).

Why it matters for the graph

The count can reverse an arrow. Yeshayahu 36–39 repeats Melachim II 18–20. By Bava Basra 15a, Chizkiyahu's generation wrote Yeshayahu and Yirmiyahu wrote Melachim — so Yeshayahu's text comes first and Melachim follows it. The academic view holds that Yeshayahu took those chapters from Melachim. Under "the earliest is the source", the direction of that link depends on this decision; with both values stored, the disagreement is shown, not hidden.

Tanach under both counts — the evidence on the day of the ruling

Tradition: who wrote each book by Bava Basra 14b–15a; the years by Seder Olam as usually computed (± a year or two). Academic: mainstream ranges, converted to Hebrew years by arithmetic.

bookwrote it (Bava Basra 14b–15a)traditionacademic, converted
TorahMoshe; the last eight verses machlokes2448–2488final form ~3300–3350
YehoshuaYehoshua; Elazar, then Pinchas finished~2516~3140–3200
ShoftimShmuel~2871–2883~3140–3200
ShmuelShmuel; Gad HaChozeh and Nasan HaNavi finished~2883–2924~3140–3200
MelachimYirmiyahu~3338–3364~3140–3201
YirmiyahuYirmiyahu3298–~3340~3134–3300
YechezkelAnshei Knesses HaGedolahsaid 3332–3354; written ~3408–3442~3168–3200
YeshayahuChizkiyahu and his companywritten ~3228 and after1–39 ~3020–3060; 40–55 ~3220; 56–66 ~3240–3310
Trei AsarAnshei Knesses HaGedolahwritten ~3408–3442~3000 to ~3300; collected by ~3580
RusShmuel~2871–2883~3000–3310, disputed
TehillimDavid, through ten elders~2884–2924collection closed ~3560–3600
IyovMoshe2448–2488~3160–3460
Mishlei, Koheles, Shir HaShirimShlomo said; Chizkiyahu's company wrotesaid 2924–2964; written ~3228 and after~3260–3560
EichahYirmiyahu~3320, before the churban~3175–3200
DanielAnshei Knesses HaGedolahwritten ~3408–34423594–3597
EstherAnshei Knesses HaGedolah~3405~3360–3560
Ezra–Nechemiah, Divrei HaYamimEzra; Nechemiah finished~3413–3442~3360–3460

The machlokesim, within the Torah world: whether the Torah was given scroll by scroll or sealed (R' Yochanan and Resh Lakish, Gittin 60a); who wrote the last eight verses (R' Yehuda or R' Nechemiah, and R' Shimon, Bava Basra 15a); Ibn Ezra's "secret of the twelve" (Devarim 1:2); when Iyov lived, or whether he was a parable (Bava Basra 15a–b); whether Malachi is Ezra (Megillah 15a); Yechezkel and Koheles nearly hidden (Shabbos 13b, 30b); Eichah written before the churban (Moed Katan 26a). Between the Torah world and the academy: the documentary hypothesis (Wellhausen, 1878) against R' David Zvi Hoffmann, Umberto Cassuto and R' Mordechai Breuer's "aspects"; Yeshayahu 40–66 (Döderlein 1775, Duhm 1892); Daniel under Antiochus IV (Porphyry; now the academic consensus).

Every traditional line above was read from the library's own text; the academic dates and the derived Seder Olam years are standard references, not yet checked line by line.

The full write-up, with every source and its address: experiments/2026-10-01-tanach-dates.

What rests on this


Generated from the register (docs/decisions/0002-seder-olam-count.md). A changed value is recorded as a new entry; the old one is never overwritten.

On this page